Showing posts with label match reaction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label match reaction. Show all posts

Lesser of Two Evils? | a D.C. United Match Reaction

An uninspiring win to say the least. I’ll hold back on loosing with both bores until De Rosario gets back on the field. Indeed, rather than delving into minutiae, let’s just have a look at the biggest point I took away from the match, shall we?

Full credit to Pajoy. Despite the obvious handicap of his ridiculous hair[1], he did manage the only goal of the game. He also ran his socks off chasing balls and harrying defenders.

But.

And there’s always a but, isn’t there?

Carlos Ruiz (and you can count me with those who think Rico Clark was entirely justified for booting the Little Fish while he flopped about on the turf [viz], but I digress). Carlos Ruiz had just over ten minutes on the field. In those ten minutes he had three chances and did something that Pajoy, for all his effort, just doesn’t do very well.

He combined with the rest of the attack. Directly and quickly.

Balls forward were knocked into space with one touch or held with consideration and an eye for runners. Contrast, if you will, with Pajoy’s penchant for dribbling or holding until he loses possession or picking passes that don’t lead runners but stop them in their tracks.

Pajoy’s wastefulness in front of net has been the focal point of much of the ire directed against him, but for me the number of attacks he kills by dallying on the ball or failing to bring others into the play is the far greater sin. And for all the many sins piled at his feet, Ruiz isn’t guilty of this one.


  1. And this match certainly had its fair share, didn’t it? I’d say Valasquez shaded the title for Most Absurd Coif though. Quite a feat when Beckerman’s around.  ↩

Half of a Solid Effort | a USA Match Reaction

This was pretty much a must win for the USMNT – a decisive moment in the Klinsmann Epoch. Which made the starting midfield selection a bit…puzzling. Granted, Jones would start regardless of who’s healthy, though he’s also a potential time-bomb of petulance and rash action. But Zusi? In just his fourth cap and first competitive appearance? Torres, who has never failed to disappoint in a US shirt? And Williams playing d-mid for the first time with the USMNT[1]?

That’s either supreme confidence, chutzpah, or suicidal bravery on Klinsmann’s part.

Thing was, for the first half, it worked. The US played fluid, one- and two-touch stuff, pinging the ball around and creating a handful of good chances. Only the frame of the goal, some last-ditch blocks, a touch of wasteful finishing, and heroics from the Jamaican goalkeeper kept the sheet clean.

All well and good, but that second half…

Yes, the US managed to score on a goalkeeping flub and make that goal stand up, but the second half performance was worrying in the extreme. Even before the goal, all of the slick, quick passing evaporated in a rash of aimless long balls and cheaply conceded possession. Assured defense gave way to marginal tackles and confusion in the ranks. Jamaica had chances – not great ones – but chances that could have put paid to US qualification hopes. Sure, the US had at least as many of their own, but they looked miles away from the dominating side from the first half.

Isn’t Klinsmann’s supposed strength managing the psychology of the side? It certainly isn’t the tactics[2]. And for all the bravery of his midfield selection from the start, why Clint Dempsey went 90 minutes is beyond me. He was looking increasingly gassed and giving the ball away while trying to do too much in bad areas.

In the end, the job that needed to be done got done, but not in a manner that leaves me with any degree of confidence going forward. Sure, we should make it comfortably to the Hex now, and maybe the US will fare better against teams less inclined to pack things in so much, but I’m more than a little concerned. Maybe the return of Bradley from injury and a match-fit Dempsey make all the difference[3]. We shall see.


  1. And yes, I know that he prefers to play d-mid and plays there for Hoffenheim, but still…  ↩

  2. More than a little surprised the US didn’t go 4–5–1 to lock things down, leaving Gomez and Shea on the flanks to pin back the Jamaican fullbacks while Altidore occupied the center backs. Three in the middle would have shored up possession and probably limited all those aimless long balls as well.  ↩

  3. No, I’m not ignoring the missing Landon Donovan. He’s a quality player and I’ll be happy to have him back (my long history of complaints about his various disappearing acts and petulance aside), but I’m not sure he’s a difference-maker at the level of Dempsey of Bradley anymore.  ↩

That's Benny-Ball | a DC United Match Reaction

The Jak is Back? (image courtesy mlssoccer.com)

So the opposition was solid defensively but not up to much on the attack. So Montreal were missing some of their key cogs to injury and suspension. So the first half wasn’t United’s finest effort. At the end of the night, United still ran out 3–0 winners, posted an emphatic response to last week’s disappointing loss, and seized sole possession of first place in the East as their rivals for the top spot stumbled elsewhere.

Let’s begin with three key talking points…

  • Level of urgency. In the first half, United didn’t look like a team that were hungry to take the game by the scruff of the neck, to punish a team that had played in mid-week, was missing key starters, and was starting to stumble after a decent start to their expansion season. But after the break, the fire returned. I’d imagine that Benny had some choice words at half-time, and the results were evident on the field. A poignant example? As the game pushed on towards 90 minutes, with United up 2–0, they were still the team creating more chances, pushing for a third despite the toll taken by the heat. Montreal, down by a pair, were reduced to the odd counter-attacking opportunity. Given United’s Soehn-esque legacy to shut up shop too quickly, continuing to force the attack until the final whistle was refreshing. A stoppage time third was fitting reward.

  • Boskovic vs. Neal. You’d have been forgiven for thinking Boskovic was the gung-ho English chap and Neal the crafty Balkan wizard based on last night’s evidence. Boskovic’s array of long bombs and Hollywood through-ball attempts[1] seemed more in the direct Brit-ball (or perhaps contract-justifying) vein than Neal’s more patient, deep-lying distribution, touching the ball multiple times in every move, accurately spreading play to the flanks, seeking out possession with constant movement rather than short, heroic bursts. Of course, Neal came on with fresh legs against guys who’d been toiling in the heat for an hour and had a less congested midfield to deal with (Montreal had shifted from five to four in midfield as they pushed up a second forward to chase goals). I’d be remiss if I didn’t highlight that Boskovic still brought his superior dead-ball delivery to the table, but still, given that I’m sure we were all assuming that Neal’s arrival would mean Pontius going up top and De Rosario dropping into midfield, it’s just another sign of the depth and versatility of the current roster that Neal was able to slot so well into the central playmaking role, actually improving possession in the bargain.

  • The Jak is back? Is it time to come full circle on Jakovic? The evidence is here on these pages to see just how much I was excited by Jakovic’s early appearances for United. Sure he made a stunning array of youthful defender mistakes, but his calm on the ball, the ability to step out from defense and penetrate the opposition with pass or dribble, the seeming ease with which he would rob attackers of the ball, those things had me hugely excited because I assumed the naiveté would fade with experience. Then came the years of injury and frustration as he just didn’t seem to progress as a player, even to the point where I was beginning to question whether he might have more value in trade to one of MLS’s Canuck contingent. But he was excellent last night. True, there wasn’t much evidence of the libero-style defender, but his positioning and tackling were consistent and his anticipation impressive. Maybe all that time off injured and watching will pay off in a more rounded and tactically astute player?

Quick hits?

  • Remember the whistlemen in this match when things inevitably go against us later. On a different day, the opener never happens as Jakovic gets called for a PK, the lineman keeps his flag down on Mapp’s breakaway, and the handful of handball shouts by Montreal are given.

  • Chances were created in both halves by the high forward (Santos or Salihi) tracking back to win the ball off advancing Montreal midfielders. That’s Benny-ball[2].

  • Definitely prefer Pontius on the flank and De Rosario as a floating forward. Though the latter wasn’t at his most influential, he did feed Pontius for the only real bit of quality in the first half. The defender in me died a little when two defenders bit on Pontius’s feint inside, but then again, I suppose his constant shifting of the ball onto his right throughout his professional career set up the move back to his left perfectly.

  • Does a goal, a few decent crosses/through-balls, and not getting severely burned by Mapp (save the time that the linesman incorrectly raised the flag) justify Russell’s acquisition and spot in the starting XI (if not on the roster as a whole)?

  • While I still think Santos’s hold-up play makes him a better fit for the team in general, the build-up to the third goal, with Salihi as the fulcrum of a flowing move and the garbage-man waiting to clean up the scaps, was the type of pass-and-move stuff I crave.

Again we come to a gap in the schedule, where United will have to watch their rivals for the Eastern Conference crown try to cash in their games in hand in a bid to overtake the Black-and-Red. Both Sporting KC and the Red Bulls failed at the last hurdle, but both are still playing reasonably well. With Chicago making a strong push to be in the mix at the top, the run-in should prove interesting. Too bad MLS rewards post-season glory rather than the long, regular-season slog. You’ll forgive me if I choose to honor the latter.

Vamos United!


  1. Save when he selfishly didn’t play De Rosario in for a sitter after bundling past a defensive roadblock at the top of the box in the first half. Olsen’s angry reaction on the bench mirrored my own.  ↩

  2. Uh-oh, I smell a long-awaited update to the FBF glossary coming…  ↩

Quick Thoughts on United v. Red Bulls

Apologies for the lack of posting of late. We have a new addition to Clan Fullback, and the baby is taking priority over blogging. Still, I was able to catch much of last night’s loss to the Red Bulls and have a few thoughts which my sleep-deprived brain will struggle to transmit to my fingers…
  • Maicon-nective Tissue - I can’t see how Salihi continues to start ahead of Santos. While the Albanian is the better pure finisher (ignoring the odd wild-card spectacular from Santos), the team functions better with Santos in the mix. His hold up play and ability to pick a pass when he drops deep (witness the assist to Pontius among many other examples) creates both more possession and a larger threat from the flank players pushing past him. In a related point, Boskovic looked pretty impressive from the perspective of a provider when he came on, delivering the sort of service that Salihi was not getting in the first half. Conundrum: if you start Boskovic to provide for Salihi but require Santos for target/hold-up play to link the lines, you can push Pontius to the flank, but where does De Rosario go?
  • I’m Not Loving It - For all his physical gifts, when McDonald tries to play soccer, the trouble starts. If I were Benny and this were FM, I’d give him “Limited Defender” instructions. Keep it simple. Don’t over-complicate things. Get the ball to the flanks rather than trying those ridiculous cross field passes that inevitably seem to end up at the feet of the opposition. Sadly, it’s not just with the ball that these issues crop up. Occasional lapses in positioning, particularly from early crosses, and a lack of anticipation often mar generally solid defensive performances. See also in the "not a very good soccer player" sweepstakes: Danny Cruz. Sigh.
  • No Panic Buttons - All of that said, and ignoring the rapid-fire opener and relatively bright start, United looked like a team that hasn’t been playing many matches of late. When they started to get into their stride as the second half wore on, possession shifted and the chances started coming, last ditch blocks from the Bulls and wayward finishing stealing a point that was there for the taking. Some of that had to do with the substitutions (Santos linking the lines in place of the anonymous Salihi, Boskovic pulling strings and prying open gaps, getting Danny Cruz as far away from the playing field as possible), but I suspect getting up to the speed of the game (and the Red Bulls set a fairly good pace, full credit to their under-strength side) and building rhythm played their part.
So, home next to a Montreal team that’s been hot on their own patch, but stuttering on the road. It’s worth remembering that they managed a draw on their first visit to RFK, though United were fielding a less than full-strength side. That said, Montreal have found themselves as a team since that early meeting. Olsen has generally been able to inspire responses from his team when they were required. A thumping delivered to the expansion side before the break would do just the trick in confirming that United’s standing in the table isn’t a false one…

Top Tier Response? | a DC United Match Reaction

Don’t think you were alone if you went into the half shaking your head and wondering how United were 2–0 up. Some combination of luck, Boskovic free kicks, and Hamid’s reflexes opened a margin that didn’t seem so pronounced on the field, particularly after the Guy injury forced Heaps to move Feilhaber inside where he belongs.

Still, it seemed harsh and bewildering to see United ship two goals so quickly to start the second half. That’s where we hit the point we so often have this season – United wobbling and looking ready to collapse as they have so often in recent seasons, the fans breaking out the iron undies through force of habit. And then?

The response.

To the talking points!

  • Heart transplant. Languid Pivot or Dynamic Presence? Which do you prefer? United has proven that it can play two styles depending upon who operates at the heart of the machine, but, while I’m on record as preferring De Rosario higher up the pitch, I still think he’s the better a-mid option for the set of players United have at their disposal. True, Boskovic’s free kicks are a big bonus, but United just seem more threatening and less ponderous with De Rosario at the helm. Transition is quicker and the flank play more dangerous.

  • The Santos Factor. I’ll admit it, I’m stunned at how effective Santos has been. Not only the goals, but his general hold-up and connective play – amply demonstrated by his beating two men with a clever drag-back, playing De Rosario into space, and getting on the end of the return ball to win the match. Much like De Rosario in midfield, Santos makes the team function better. Salihi may make better runs and be a more reliable (if marginally less spectacular) finisher, but Santos combines better with those around him, can win balls in the air, and provides a dash of the unexpected, both with the ball at his feet and with his shooting from range.

  • Hamid MOTM. Don’t think there’s any question about this one. He was beaten twice, but made three (at the very least) excellent saves to prevent sure goals and swung the balance of the game with each. In the first half, he saved 1 v 1 on the break against Sene to prevent New England leveling the match. And in the second stanza, he came off his line to break up another Sene burst and keep the Revs from pulling ahead. But the reaction save off the late headed chance was, along with the Santos goal, the defining moment of the match. That’s a huge save to put United clear atop the Eastern Conference.

  • The General. Benny’s starting to come into his own tactically. We’ve always known he could motivate; he could do that when he was playing. But the in-game adaptations that he’s starting to make are promising. While I thought that maybe he packed it in a little too early (though not Soehn-early), he did see the problems that the Feilhaber-Joseph midfield axis was creating and swapped in Wolff to help clog the middle.

Quick hits?

  • Good to see DeLeon back on the field. Didn’t look as explosive, but the control was still there, and he’s bound to be working off the rust.

  • Where the hell was Korb on Sene’s opener for the Revs? Out of position and jogging back. Did have a subtle bump later to put off Joseph on a headed chance though.

  • I wonder if the frequency of Bum Hammy Hammer strikes has something to do with the slipperiness of the RFK pitch.

  • Is it possible to hate Heaps the coach more than Heaps the player (or Heaps the commentator for that matter)?

With United pulling clear atop the Eastern Conference, I’m still not sure I can reconcile myself to the feeling that they have a legitimate claim to be counted among the league’s top tier. That’s the last few years of caution keeping me constantly looking over my shoulder, waiting for the surprise blow to the back of the head[1]. And it’s not like United have been particularly lucky with injuries either. They’re a genuinely deep team with good balance across the roster. Question is: do they tempt fate come the transfer window to mess with a winning formula in search of that extra, championship boost?

Vamos, United!


  1. Hmmm. Why would I be expecting surprise blows to the back of the head having just spent a couple of hours seeing Jay Heaps’ face every couple of minutes? Shocking.  ↩

Movin' On Up | a DC United Match Reaction

A measured outing from a makeshift lineup and a deserved victory. If not for an excellent performance from Pickens in the Colorado net, it would have been an even uglier scoreline for the Rapids, and that has to be encouraging. But you can’t ignore that Colorado were severely banged up as well, lacked the rhythm that comes with games in quick succession, and still made things uncomfortable at times for United. Let’s get right to the major talking point I want to focus on.

Movement. It’s not so much an issue now, but off-the-ball movement used to be one of the drums I would always be banging here on FBF. Soehn’s United in particular were guilty of groan-inducing, static play. But look at the movement on the goals tonight. On the first, casual play by the Rapids in midfield hands the ball to Neal[1]. He pushes forward, forcing the issue and creating a 3 v 4 break with Zapata struggling to get back on the Colorado left after his poor ball set the break in motion. Salihi’s intelligent cross-field run drags both center backs with him – away from the gaping hole left by Zapata’s pushing forward – and De Rosario sees the opening, darting into it, forcing Larentowicz to decide between tracking him or closing down Neal. Larentowicz remains indecisive, Zapata can’t recover, and Neal’s ball splits the defense perfectly, the pass and Salihi’s run removing all obstacles and leaving De Rosario with a clear chance that he buries.

The second goal highlights De Rosario’s excellent work rate as a second forward and Boskovic’s surprising range in central midfield[2]. De Rosario tracks down Korb’s hopeful lob, keeping the ball alive on the left side of the box. Unable to find the pass to set up a shot for Salihi, he drops it for the trailing Neal who takes a touch and spots the run of Boskovic, making a dart in behind when the entire back line pushes up bar Zapata (rough night for him, huh?). Boskovic’s header forces another Pickens save and Salihi, still working the margins of the Colorado defense in the box, pounces on the rebound.



Quick hits?

  • Big, Olsenian efforts on the part of multiple midfielders to get back and man the barricades when Colorado threatened on the break. Nice to see, particularly from guys (Najar, Boskovic, Neal) who haven’t been locks to start. Competition and a fiery boss are good things.
  • Hard to believe this is Kitchen’s first year as a professional d-mid. He puts out so many fires and is quality on the ball to boot. United dodged a couple of huge bullets with his injury scare and the US failure to make the Olympics.
  • Woolard has been tremendous as an emergency center back, using his reading of the game rather than physical presence or technical quality to get the job done. Parkhurstian, almost.
  • But Korb has quietly been turning in solid outings on the left as well, preventing Woolard’s shift from opening further holes. I haven’t been high on Korb thus far in his United career, but at this point, I think a healthy Dudar or Jakovic pushes Woolard back to the left, and Korb to the right to replace the stuttering Russell.
  • On the other hand, I’m well and truly sick of Danny Cruz. I get why Olsen values him[3]. I might too if he possessed anything resembling technical ability, tactical sense, or discipline. Hell, any one of the three might do. However frustrating he might be for the opposition to deal with, he’s no picnic for me either.

So a steady start to the home-stand against mediocre opposition. With multiple guys starting to return from injury and a couple of winnable games at home against Eastern Conference opposition before a well-deserved break, United have a chance to go into the summer high on confidence and high on the table. The trick, of course, is maintaining that confidence and that position during the long slog through the sweltering heat. That’s where the quality of depth will have its chance to tell and where Olsen will be tested as to whether he can keep players fresh and hungry.

Vamos United!


  1. Who had been, to this point, turning in another anonymous outing that had me scratching my head about why we signed him. Given his part in both goals and generally steady, if unspectacular, play, I withdraw my premature leanings towards criticism and proffer a tentative thumbs up for experienced depth.  ↩

  2. Might he yet earn an extension? I know that I’m in the minority in preferring De Rosario played as a second forward, but Boskovic showed far more mobility and desire in this match than I’ve seen from him … ever? Tough to say what he’d do against better opposition, and Kitchen’s range played no small part in his good showing, but that was an encouraging performance.  ↩

  3. It’s not hard; he doesn’t possess more than one positive quality: covering massive amounts of turf like a decapitated chicken. Hey! Same initials (Danny Cruz, Decapitated Chicken) . I think I smell a dubbing approaching.  ↩

Not This Year | a DC United Match Reaction

There was a moment – just the one, mind you – where I thought this one might go south. And it was this: a clear handball on the line to deny United a goal. Should have been a penalty. Should have been a red card. Given just how fragile TFC must be after their terrible start to 2012, that would have been a death warrant for them. But the whistlemen had the blinders on, and I prepared for the worst.

What I hadn’t reckoned on was just how bad TFC is and how confident and committed[1] Olsen’s crew are. Granted, United were easily the better side in the first half despite playing with some key absentees and a re-jiggered lineup. But early in the second stanza, Toronto were asking all the questions until that fateful moment. I hate to keep harping on about it because it’s getting quite stale, but those were the kind of moments that have turned games sour for United the past few of years.

Not this year.

Talking points?

  • Veteran at the back. Russell and Dudar were the guys brought in to stabilize what had been a leaky back line. While Russell’s been hit or miss in that department, Dudar, after a few early stumbles, has been immense. Yet neither were on the field in this match, and it fell to an unlikely source to step into the gap. Enter Daniel Woolard. Christ but I’ve been hard on the guy, but I’m going to bury that hatchet. I still can’t bring myself to say that he’s any good, but he puts in an honest shift and gets the job done. Sure, part of the reason he looked comfortable in the center was that TFC played with just one front runner and Kitchen was hoovering up the midfield scraps much more effectively than Saragosa. But he also had a number of key interventions in the air and on the ground and never looked as out of place as both Kitchen and Russell did when forced into emergency duty in the center of defense. What he lacks in technical ability, he makes up for with tactical nous.

  • Fullback options. Of course, Woolard has been the only consistent fullback United has fielded this year, so with him pulled into the middle and Russell on the bench, that meant two new faces on the flanks. While Korb turned in his usual outing of middling defense[2] and piss-poor passing, Najar was really interesting on the right. He did have some shaky moments positionally, but his quickness got him out of those jams and he’s a terror going forward with the ball at his feet (and put a few good balls through for the forwards from deep positions). Granted, he’s probably a better option at the back in games where United are going to dominate possession or are chasing the game, but at least we’ve got a viable fourth option at fullback. Of course, if you saw any of that abomination on Wednesday, you already saw his usefulness bursting from deep…

  • Open the floodgates! But Najar-at-right-back wasn’t the only useful thing to come out of the loss in midweek. Somewhat lost in the shuffle was Salihi finally getting off the mark. The “what if?” game is for suckers, but it says here on my scorecard that putting one in the net is just the sort of thing that gives you the confidence to take volleys from outrageous angles and stick them just inside the post. Tremendous finish to seal the three points – just what it said on the tin when United acquired him. And Salihi heating up couldn’t have come at a better time with Santos starting to labor…

  • Sit Santos? He started the season on fire, but he looked beat here. His first touch was abyssmal. He wasn’t winning balls in the air. His assortment of dummies and flicks just weren’t coming off and had me growling at the tube more than once (so I assume Olsen was making similar noises). True, Santos was still getting back after the ball defensively and did put one decent effort on frame, but he may need a rest. Given that United really don’t have any other reasonable target-man options, they’ll need to resort less to the direct ball if he does sit.

  • Bye, bye Boskovic. Speaking of less direct options. Branko’s bag of subtle touches in tight spaces and languid playing style are at jarring contrast with the way the rest of the team wants to play. They’re racing about at 100 mph while he’s turning pirouettes in slow motion. He’s a lumbering post-up guy on a team built for the fast break. Can’t see him sticking through the summer, but that opens some big possibilities (and a big chunk of the salary cap) come transfer window time. Hmmm…

Quick hits?

  • Neal looks tidy on the ball but largely anonymous. Doesn’t cause the sorts of problems you’d like a wide midfielder to cause.

  • Cruz eats up the ground, so he’s hugely useful from a defensive point of view, but he’s a black hole with the ball at his feet.

  • Hamid was solid. Not sure Willis did huge amounts wrong during his starting run, but Hamid deserves to keep starting both on current form and potential for development.

  • I’m going to have to do a separate post on where to field Pontius. I’ve said it before, but the comparisons to Dempsey are intriguing.

TFC just might erase any records for futility that Onalfo’s United inked in the Big Book of MLS Failures. They’re terrible, so a road victory and clean sheet against them should probably be taken with a generous dose of salt. That said, you have to win the games set before you, and United were playing with a new-look lineup after Olsen rode his winning team to exhaustion. A road win and a shut-out with a makeshift back line speaks to the quality of the squad, even with the current freakish rash of injuries knocking out spots 2–4 on the center back depth chart.

Vamos United!


  1. Witness King’s stoppage time header off the line. The game was in the bag, but the fight wasn’t over. That’s got Olsen written all over it.  ↩

  2. Though I’ll grant he didn’t look half as lost in the air as he usually does. Progress?  ↩

No Sucker Punches Allowed | a DC United Match Reaction

Well, we can finally retire the “no back-to-back wins since the turn of the decade” refrain. This won’t be a long or detailed reaction as I tuned in just in time to see Santos head home his first and missed chunks of the game due to family commitments (would it be callous to call them distractions instead?). Instead, let me harken back to the archaic Good, Bad & Ugly format. Given that I probably last dragged out said format back around the time United was posting consecutive wins, it seems appropriate…


The Good

  • Resilience. I, and others – including members of the team, have gone to the “we would have lost this game last year” well more than once this year. But there’s a reason it keeps cropping up. Last year – hell, the last three years – United would have conceded the equalizer and then failed the gut-check, falling to the inevitable opposition winner. This year, they get their noses back in front twice and looked much more likely to score the next goal than Houston did down the stretch. That latest bit was actually the most pleasing part of this game for me. Instead of going into the early Soehn-bunker, United kept pressing (though not stupidly) for another goal, and that was where…
  • De Rosario shined. Not sure his “goal” didn’t skim Pontius’ stylish coif, but that didn’t really matter. This was the first game of the young 2012 season where De Rosario looked like the reigning MVP. Skill in tight spaces, drawing defenders out of position and leaving them screwed into the turf, spraying balls to wide areas and forward runners, making intelligent runs without the ball. Terrific stuff.
  • Santos’ energy and movement were excellent, and he combined really well with the players running off him. But it’s the goals that are key. How long has it been since United had a player scoring this many with his head? Here’s hoping he stays hungry and motivated.

The Bad

  • Before Dudar fell to the Bum Hammy Hammer, Houston weren’t getting much change through the middle or in the air. With him gone, gaps started appearing and the long ball to the Dynamo forwards wasn’t a lost cause anymore. If he’s down for any significant amount of time, we’re going to suffer. Figures that he would pull up lame on the back of effusive (and deserved) praise from Harkes in the broadcast booth about the quality of his positioning and distribution[1].
  • Of perhaps similar concern was the highway Houston was paving down their left flank in the second half. Kitchen looked a bit lost, failing to close down the crosser quickly enough on the first and turning the ball over to set up the second. On a number of other occasions he got caught out of position, either too high or too central. Is this next stretch of games where the lack of fullback depth finally raises its ugly mug?

The Ugly

  • Danny Cruz is a perpetual motion machine, but he’s also a card magnet and generally commits at least one cringe-worthy challenge per game, if not more. Some of these yellows are going to start turning red. It’s just the luck of the whistleman draw they haven’t already.
  • Willis, though he generally had a decent game, needs to take the blame for the second (conditions understood and willfully ignored as I’m not in the keepers’ union) and probably could have come to claim the cross on the first. He’s also not as quick off his line as Hamid, which led to a couple of scary moments. Is that enough to get Hamid back between the posts?
  • Given the cliched “slippery as an ice rink” condition of the pitch, we really needed Jakovic out there so we could outnumber the Dynamo on the vital “more Canadians fielded” statistic. Hockey? Canada? Cliche? Sigh.

Frankly, I’m left a bit confused in the wake of this victory. Having suffered through the last few years, I can’t help but feel that the fall is coming. I couldn’t help feeling it was coming in this match as well. Each time Houston equalized, I prepped the iron underpants for the pain that was sure to follow. It’s strange to be watching the guys in black mounting successful rallies rather than succumbing to sucker-punches. Not sure how long it’s going to take to either (1) get used to this or (2) develop any realistic sense of optimism, but in the meantime…

Vamos United!


  1. Harkes also was laying it on thick for Willis just prior to the slick ball skittering through his gloves for Houston’s second. Burn the witch!  ↩

Satisfaction | a DC United Match Reaction

Well, that was satisfying. Let’s get right to the talking points, shall we?

  • Four goals is nice, but more impressive for me is the defensive performance. Henry and Cooper came into this game averaging more than a goal a game – each! They got very few good looks tonight, and most of those from distance. True, Henry managed to pad his goal tally, but he did so from a set piece when the match was all but won. The difference between having Russell on the back stick rather than Korb was telling when the crosses came flying in (28 according to mlssoccer.com’s stats, vs. just 12 for United), but the effect of the return of Dudar can’t be ignored either[1]. Metrobull crosses and long balls turned into lost causes, his range of distribution was excellent, and he made a number of nice reads on the deck, stepping up to cut out potentially dangerous passes.

  • Is Pontius the answer up top? It’s long been my contention that Pontius is Dempsey-like in that his best position is debatable (and, of course, the positions he plays are the same). It’s hard to argue with results. Salihi may be pulling down the DP coin, but he’s yet to bag a goal. In significantly fewer minutes, Pontius has four playing as a forward. His movement and ability on the dribble make him a better foil for Santos as well. I’m not going to argue that signing Salihi was a mistake (yet). I still think he has a role to play and will figure things out as he adapts to the league. When the other strikers hit a barren patch, he’ll get his chance, and it’s a luxury to have a proven, veteran goal-scorer in reserve.

  • I’m not so certain about Boskovic though. He just doesn’t fit the high-energy approach that Olsen favors. And I find it telling that in a situation that seemed tailor made for Boskovic’s talents (late-game lead, time to slow things down and play possession), Olsen called on King to spell De Rosario.

  • Imagine, if you will, another night and a ref less tolerant of the physical stuff or more easily intimidated by the names on the shirts (Henry…cough, cough)[2]. I could easily see the first and third goals never being allowed to happen and United suffering a couple of marginal PK calls. Kudos to Geiger for letting them play.

  • McDonald is often wasteful in possession, defaulting to the aimless long ball[3]. Though that worked out in our favor once tonight, I’d like to see more of the technical pairing of Jakovic (striding out of defense with the ball at his feet) with Dudar (prompting the attack with searching balls sprayed to the flanks). That assumes, of course, that Jakovic can manage a stretch of games without suffering an injury.

Quick hits?

  • After an off-night in midweek where it looked like he might be hitting a bit of a rookie wall, DeLeon bounced back with another good performance (and another goal).

  • Still not convinced by Woolard, but he was only exposed a few times against Richards, who could probably finish the 40m twice before Woolard crossed the line once.

  • Once again, it’s hard to fault Cruz for effort and defensive tracking, but with the ball at his feet…sigh. Can we somehow fuse the best of Cruz and Najar?

After the next match we’ll be more than a quarter of the way into the season. United sits second in the Eastern Conference, in solid playoff position, but a quick glance at the table shows that everybody behind United (save Montreal) have games in hand. Still, six games unbeaten, a firm beat-down of the big rival, and letting in less than a goal a game (and conceding few good chances to boot, not just riding their luck)? I’ll take that.

Vamos United!


  1. And makes you really rue that he couldn’t play midweek. Corradi wouldn’t have won nearly as many aerial duels with Dudar on the pitch.  ↩

  2. Interestingly, I needed to rely on a Polish-language stream for a little bit of this match (don’t ask), and I heard repeated mention of what sounded like “weenie sack.” I can only imagine that the announcer was discussing the suspended Rafa Marquez.  ↩

  3. Otherwise known as the Burch Special.  ↩

Rotation Policy | a DC United Match Reaction

Let’s begin with this: United got lucky. Sure, sure, they probably shaded the quantity of chances overall and were easily the better team in the second half, but Montreal had better looks. Slightly more accuracy in their finishing, and Benny’s got more cause to question his rotation policy than he’ll already be doing tonight.

That said, it’s hard to argue that anybody on the United side (Korb’s first half misery, Najar and Boskovic’s rustiness, DeLeon’s running out of steam, and a reversion to mean for Woolard aside) didn’t have the quality to be a starter. But the lack of minutes showed on those brought in, and I’m taking no bets that an unchanged lineup (injury-enforced swaps excepted) puts up a much more cohesive showing and gets all three points.

Given the tilt with New York at the weekend however, and the reasonable depth that United possesses, I can understand the rationale of going with the team that Benny did. Doesn’t make dropping points at home to expansion-fodder any more palatable though…

Talking Points?

  • All credit to Santos. He’s done more than enough to have a strangle-hold on a starting position. When his arrival was announced, I was critical, wondering how a player who seemed so lazy in previous MLS stints was going to deal with the Olsen ethos. But he’s worked hard, contributing excellent hold up play, a physical presence in the box, and critical goals to boot, two of them, including tonight’s, manufactured out of absolutely nothing.

  • Boskovic can hit some useful balls into the box from deeper wide areas and is tough to knock off the ball, but he’s just too slow for the style that United wants to play. True, you can say that Santos’ general energy, confidence, and hold-up play tilted the field once he came on, but De Rosario’s increased dynamism in the a-mid role stretched Montreal defensively, opening space and disrupting their ability their links between midfield and attack. I still prefer De Rosario as a withdrawn forward[1], but it’s hard to argue that there are better options for United in central midfield at the moment.

  • After the first half, I was all set to unleash on Korb as looking completely out of his depth, but he started the second like a house on fire, hitting excellent crosses and probing long balls, making good tackles, and generally not putting a foot wrong. Until his aerial weakness was exploited…again. If Korb is at right back and I’m the opposition coach, I tell my right wingers to cross to the back stick as often as possible. Of course, the cross should have been closed down better in the first place, but still…

Quick Hits?

  • You’ve got to think that Dudar vs. Corradi would have been a much more useful matchup for United. The Italian was dominant in the air against United’s center backs[2].

  • Standard service has resumed vis-a-vis Woolard after a couple of really solid outings. His positioning was generally good, but a couple of shocking technical fails demonstrated his “quality.” Adequate MLS squad player. Shouldn’t be a starter.

  • DeLeon was looking gassed, and Pontius looked most effective when he pulled wide. I expect DeLeon will get a well-earned rest, and Pontius will start on the left against New York.

  • Willis looked shaky on crosses and corners. Strange considering that’s been once of his strengths in his recent run of good form.

I’m sure there’s more that I’m missing or have forgotten in my allergy-induced haze, but bed is calling, so I’ll leave things there…

After the comeback against the Revs, I wasn’t alone in the feeling that last year we would have found a way to lose that game. I have similar feelings here. Coming as late as it did and against the general run of play in the second half, Corradi’s go-ahead goal could have been a killer. Instead, United kept up the pressure and were rewarded with the equalizer.

Of course, sometimes luck or fate or whatever you want to call it has to play its part as well, and Arnaud hitting wide from that late corner that pinged around the box certainly reeked of that. Almost as if, on this night in particular, United losing wasn’t an option.

Descanse en paz, Chico.


  1. Despite the fact that he filled his pants on two opportunities when he got in behind the defense tonight.  ↩

  2. Though Russell has done an admirable job filling in over the last game and change. Compared to McDonald’s mixed bag of distribution, Russell looks Xavi-esque.  ↩

Ebbs & Flows | a DC United Match Reaction

That was the story of this match, as it so often is in MLS where teams are more evenly matched than is often the case in other leagues. With Joseph missing through suspension and the Revs’ string-puller-in-chief Feilhaber not fit enough to start, I had high expectations. And the early going seemed to bear me out. United were on top in the early going.

But a quick counter put them on the back foot, leaving all that early promise in shambles. Still, United fought back, and a moment of De Rosario magic resulted in Santos heading home the equalizer (corner kick goal? really? and had a second attempt from a corner cleared off the line to boot). Through the remainder of the first half, United were edging things, so much so that I had a creeping sense of optimism (strange to say it, but it’s true) about the second half.

Unfortunately, that optimism looked a bit misplaced as the second stanza progressed. Neither team was dominant, but the Revs were generally the better side, carrying much of the play. When Jakovic had to come of injured (yet again – this refrain is getting tired, isn’t it?), forcing Russell into the middle and the woeful-in-the-air Korb on to wallow in the shadow of the Revs’ big front men crashing the back stick on crosses, I fully expected the worst.

And it so often looked like turning out so. Feilhaber came on to bring calm and vision to the Revs’ engine-room, prompting more effective wide play and springing runners through the middle. I thought United needed another body in the central midfield to act as a tourniquet.

Benny thought otherwise. Thankfully, he was right.

Thought it came completely against the run of play, some hustle from DeLeon and quality from Pontius created the winner. The closing stages would have been nerve-wracking, and really should have been given United’s past few years, but the final ebb never arrived.

Talking points?

  • Full credit to Santos for getting another goal and to Cruz for painting every blade of grass with his boots, but they’re frustrating players in many ways, particularly when they have the ball at their feet. Santos too often dwells and concedes possession. Cruz usually dribbles into blind alleys. Of course, given how much Salihi is struggling to make an impression and that Santos is putting the ball in the net regularly, I’d find it hard to argue that he should be benched. Not sure Cruz should be keeping Najar out though.

  • Given Kitchen’s excellent turns in the few shots he had at the d-mid role last year, I wasn’t terribly nervous about his being the heir-apparent this year. True, the thought of Morsink as Plan B made me a little queasy, but the acquisition of Saragosa[1] drew me back from the ledge. This was easily his best outing of the year though. He covered tons of ground, was smart (and capable) with the ball, and resisted the Simms-trap of playing constantly negative or horizontally. I can’t imagine we’ll be able to hang on to the kid much longer as greener pastures await, but perhaps the Olympic failure is a double blessing. Not only will he not miss time with United the summer, but he’ll avoid the attentions of potential suitors scouring the Olympic playing fields.

  • Do we declare the off-season defensive bolstering a success yet? LA abomination aside, United haven’t given up more than a goal per game. But more impressive is that they are conceding far fewer good chances and seem generally less susceptible to the complete breakdowns and massive brain-fartery that have haunted them over the past handful of seasons. Defending set pieces, another long-term Achilles heel, also seems better. It’s a long haul yet, but the start has been encouraging.

Quick Hits?

  • Pleasantly surprised with Wolff’s outing. Long-time readers will know I’m not a huge fan, but he looked decent for an old codger. Should have finished his golden chance though…

  • Willis with another solid outing in net. Couldn’t have done much with the goal, but made a couple of critical saves and bossed his box.

  • Still not sold on De Rosario in central midfield unless he has two covering behind him. I’ve long been on record as saying you need him in and around the box as much as possible.

  • That said, the other options aren’t terribly palatable. Boskovic’s window for earning a new contract is starting to close, particularly so if he can’t get on the field.

A quality start to a busy week. With the expansion-fodder from Montreal rolling into town midweek, United has an excellent chance to cement their place in the Eastern Conference playoff spots ahead of the first shots being fired in the Atlantic Cup next weekend. It’s still very early in the MLS season, yes, but better to stay with the peloton than to chase the pack through the summer, right?

Vamos United!


  1. My sympathies, and I’m sure you’ll join me here in extending them, to the player on the recent loss of his father.  ↩

Kick in the Balls? | a DC United Match Reaction

That was the headline that might have been. It was almost perfectly set up. Two Sounders had gone down previously with boots to their nether regions. On comes Marc Burch, fresh from slagging off United in the media, only for Sigi to give him just two and a half minutes to prove what he couldn’t in a handful of years with DC.

It was there for him. After a raking cross-field ball to start the move, he followed in Alonso’s shot and crashed a header off the post with just seconds to play. Of course, this is Burch we’re talking about. He’s no longer our cause for woe…

So what then is the prevailing feeling in the aftermath of a 0–0 home draw against what is arguably one of the best teams in the league?

Mixed.

Both teams had one glorious chance spurned, one good chance pinged off the post, and precious little else to show for 90 minutes of endeavor. Both spent periods in the ascendency and periods where they bent but did not break at the back. Despite the lack of goals, the neutral would have little to complain about as neither team sat back and both had their moments.

Talking points?

  • While United’s attack reverted somewhat to previous form: moves often breaking down through miscommunication, ill-timed runs, and a lack of passing anticipation or vision, the solidity of the defense was encouraging, particularly with McDonald suspended. Seattle (outside of that late, late Burch chance) created very little when they weren’t on the break[1].

  • Salihi continued his pattern of getting a half-decent chance, but not making it count. There’s a conundrum here. Are you disappointed that the guy on DP bucks couldn’t bury that one presentable chance or are you concerned that he’s not getting more than one look per game? The onus has to be on the rest of the attack to give him more chances. When those come, I have little doubt the goals will follow.

  • Najar back into the starting slot? I think so. Cruz gives you tons of energy, but he’s also liable to cause a cracked LCD when you throw something at it in frustration when he tries to do anything with the ball at his feet. Can I get an “ugh” for miserable technique? For the first 50 minutes or so I was contemplating a post on Cruz being shifted to right back since Russell looked hopeless, but the latter came on really strong in the second half before getting subbed off, and I’m really not sure I’m ready for the body (and card) count that would be sure to follow Cruz’ move to the back line. Disciplined he is not…Hope Russell’s okay, because he finally was starting to look like a worthwhile addition for twenty minutes or so.

  • Boskovic’s performance mirrored Russell’s in miniature. A hopeless beginning that started to give way to actual competence. I’ve not yet seen enough to have me calling for a new deal in the summer, and I’m not convinced that he fits with the high-energy United that Olsen wants to field (of course, neither do Dudar and Salihi, but there you go…). Still, there were times when his subtlety and calm on the ball were refreshing.

Quick hits?

  • Dudar’s heading technique is…um…let’s just say he’s got the Morrissey haircut and that’s pretty much how I imagine Morrissey heads a ball. Sigh.

  • Still not sold on De Rosario in central midfield. I know we’ve got other weapons up top now, but for my money, he’s still most dangerous closer to goal. Unleash the trequartista!

  • DeLeon had his moments, but so did Pontius in a brief substitute appearance, including a sweet flowing combination move that he probably should have pulled the trigger on a step earlier. Who do you start?

So. Disappointed in the end? Maybe a little. But given the last few years, I’m sure you were as gunshy as I was to run into the arms of Lady Optimism after the 4–1 demolition of Dallas. At this point, I’ll take back-to-back, points-earning results as something to build on, particularly with a clean sheet against a quality team.

Still, not enough for a “vamos!” though. Let’s leave it with an understated fist-pump and a smoldering Olsen-glare at the horizon, shall we?


  1. United often looks worrying vulnerable on the break, particularly after their own set pieces deep in opposition territory, but that’s pretty common for any team.  ↩

The Friday Quartet | a DC United Match Reaction

An excellent result, though you’d have been forgiven if you thought this one was going to turn sour after the break. Let’s be brutally honest. FC Dallas probably should have been up a goal or two in the first fifteen minutes. United looked slow to wake up to the game, a bit disorganized, and were finding little joy in possession.

But after that slow opening, United probably shaded the chances until Santos’ tremendous opener. FCD got the equalizer they deserved, despite the whiff of controversy surrounding their goal[1]. Going into the break, I’m sure I wasn’t the only United fan thinking, “we’ve probably had the upper hand, but I’ve seen this picture before.”

Fortunately, it wasn’t a replay of tragedies past. Another quality finish from the rookie DeLeon and a couple of clinical counters, coupled with Daniel Hernandez’ thuggish best, combined to cap a dominant second half performance.

Talking points?

  • Hamid, Najar, and Pontius have a real job on their hands to fight their way back into the starting lineup. Willis, as he was last year, has been excellent in net. Dallas had four tremendous chances in the first half, put them all on frame, but only got one past him. He was alert to through balls and had excellent control of his box on crosses and long balls. Cruz and DeLeon, the supposed backup wingers, both had excellent games, each recording a goal, with DeLeon picking up an assist on Cruz’ goal.

  • While I think you stick with DeLeon’s hot hand until he starts to struggle, Cruz is the more interesting dilemma. The sheer acreage he covers is what allows De Rosario so much freedom to get forward in support of the strikers. Najar, for all his positive qualities and obvious technical superiority, doesn’t give you that. Now, given that Salihi got two solid chances and barfed on both, do you continue to ride him, assuming he’ll come good and catch fire (keeping De Rosario in midfield), or do you push De Rosario high when Najar returns and go with two deeper-lying central midfield options? Whatever Ben decides, it’s good to have options.

  • Returning to the forwards for a moment. Sounds strange to say it, but I think you’ve got to have Santos down as the first name called for forwards at the moment[2]. How long has it been since United had a genuine, effective target forward? True, he doesn’t always work as hard as he might, but he did a reasonable job winning aerial duels and holding the ball up, and contributed two quality finishes (though I'm not likely to forgive his occasional ponderousness on the ball and failure to fight back after cheaply coughing up possession).

  • Early wobbles and the goal aside, the defense played a decent game. Perez is a handful and Villar’s movement between the lines is good (though not Ferreira-good). Though Shea didn’t have a great night, Dallas’ shifting him around suggested that maybe that wasn’t all down to him being off. I’m still not enamored of our fullback options, though Woolard had his second straight impressive performance, even managing to contribute offensively a bit. Russell, however, is a tougher sell. He just looks a bit slow of foot and thought – past his sell-by date.

Quick hits?

  • Look at the spin on Zach Loyd’s long throws and tell me he’s not doing something illegal.

  • McDonald’s tackle on Perez drew such an awful groan from me that both wife and daughter had to check to make sure I was okay. Sigh.

  • Our Balkan Buddies[3] aren’t exactly setting the pitch alight. Not sure how well their more technical, cerebral play fits with United’s high-energy approach.

  • I know this goes without saying, but holy crap was that some inconsistent whistle-work by Hilarious Grajeda.

So a dominant performance on the scoreboard, though I suspect the stats will reflect that shots and possession were fairly even, and I only really felt comfortably when the fourth went in. With that said, I don’t think you could argue that United didn’t have more and better chances over the course of the entire match. The worry, of course, will be that Dallas had four very, very good looks in the first half, two of them before United even seemed to wake up and realize there was a game on. All credit to Willis for keeping them out, and to the team for the response that followed…

Vamos United!


  1. Did Perez gain an advantage by being in an offside position? Absolutely. Hard to argue that Dudar had possession either, though I’d allow the goal just to punish him for a ridiculous error. Little bit of eau de Jakovic there methinks. Also, Santos looked offside on United’s fourth, for what it’s worth.  ↩

  2. Though I’ll stand by my pre-season assessment of Santos as a guy that scores tremendous goals but often chokes on the simpler stuff, and whose work rate isn’t exactly up to Olsen-ish standards.  ↩

  3. Boskovic and Salihi. Not sure if this will enter the FBF lexicon. Probably depends on whether Boskovic gets an extension on his contract in the summer.  ↩

Crawl Before You Run | a DC United Match Reaction

A point on the board, a clean sheet, on the road, and probably the better team by a slight margin. All without two starters. Considering the struggles of the MLS Eastern Conference versus their Western Conference counterparts, that’s not a bad return.

Those less charitable might point out that Vancouver isn’t really all that great and will struggle to be involved in the playoff picture. Of course, that’s ignoring the possibility (probability?) that United are occupying the same leaky vessel.

Talking points?

  • In contrast with the previous games, United actually looked like a team. The ball movement was quick, players looked like they had an idea of what they wanted to do with the ball prior to receiving it, and the defense was far better organized. How much of that was down to playing a team that didn’t impose themselves on the game so well as previous opponents and how much is United starting to gel remains to be seen, but it did seem promising, particularly given the number of changes in the starting lineup.

  • While the defensive organization was better, I feared for United every time they got heavy numbers forward, particularly on set pieces. With the play in front of them and Vancouver lacking the requisite lock-pickers, the defense looked solid. On the break, United was stretched, scrambling and vulnerable.

  • While the possession play was better, Santos and Salihi seemed to have little understanding between them up top and chances were few and far between. That said, Salihi probably had two of the better opportunities, and though he had to find them from set pieces, only an excellent save from Cannon kept him from opening his league account. United had better chances when De Rosario moved up top, though that seemed more a function of the play getting more ragged and open in the latter stages. Of course, United seemed to exploit their width a little better with Boskovic looking to spread the ball about and De Rosario being more mobile and popping up in the wide channels more than either Salihi or Santos.

  • Part of my criticism in the previous match was how reactive United’s play was. We’ve already discussed United actually having ideas with the ball and executing those ideas quickly and with relatively good precision[1], but what also stuck out to me – as a defender – was Dudar’s habit of winning balls from attackers. You’d assume, given his height, that he’d be a menace in the air, but it was his feet that impressed me, not in passing but in the handful of times he robbed attackers on the dribble. With McDonald’s pace and a former-midfielder’s confidence on the ball, they look a more able “stopper/cover” pairing than anything else we can field. Hassli and LeToux are a handful but didn’t accomplish much.

  • Props to Woolard. I’ve been really critical of him and of the team for trusting him as a starting left back. But he played pretty well last night and certainly looked more competent than Russell, who alternated decent patches of play with being caught out for pace and speed of thought. Still, when Woolard did manage to get into attacking positions, he looked pretty much lost. I’d like to see more out of that position, but fair play to him for a decent outing.

And finally…

  • Dudar’s hair. Anybody else getting a Morrissey vibe? Dudar from the corner, I know, I know, he’s dangerous. Or how about...Panic in the box on set pieces. Here comes Dudar. Here comes Dudar. Here comes Dudar….Here comes Dudar! Sigh.

Conclusions? Not a bad outing. “Crawl before you run” and all that. I was pleasantly surprised at how much better United looked both with the ball and without it, where before they looked plodding and bereft of ideas. The lack of goals is worrying, but at least Salihi and De Rosario had the best of the chances, and those are the guys you want in those spots.

After the disjointed pre-season and first two matches, with the full complement of players either not available or struggling with fitness, Olsen is still mixing and matching, looking for the best combinations. I think he found one in McDonald/Dudar at the back. Given the fluency of the possession but lack of goals, finding a successful pairing up top has to be his biggest concern.


  1. At least my viewing wasn’t punctuated by a series of exasperated sighs as United stupidly conceded possession again, and again, and again…  ↩

Worried Yet? | a DC United Match Reaction

Sure, the Galaxy are the class of the league and the defending champs, and yes, they were playing on their own patch. Sure, the craptastic state of the pitch and the wind didn’t help matters. But for large patches of this match, United looked like they barely new each other’s names, much less belonged in the same division as the Galaxy. Rather than enumerate all the the minor faults in United’s play, let’s focus on just three, shall we? How about (1) lack of connective tissue, (2) poor organization, and (3) an absence of Olsen-ish play?

Dots, Unconnected

While there were more cohesive and dangerous moments here than in the opener, the number of plays that broke down through seeming miscommunication, failure of technique, or simple lack of ideas was hugely frustrating. Where the Galaxy made runs and passes with purpose, anticipating each others’ movement and generally looking like they knew what they wanted to do offensively, United’s play seemed far too reactive, waiting for the delivery rather than making the run, pulling up with a frustrated toss of the hands to the heavens when balls were mis- or under-hit (or not played at all).

Though the dearth of creative runs (or the ability to spot them) was a big factor in the lack of quick transition and space in attack, I’ve got to say that I was particularly disappointed in the play of our fullbacks. Not only were they not (until very late in the match) getting forward (leading to a lack of numbers and thus dots to connect in midfield) but their passing was abysmal. Contrast Korb under-hitting a square ball that leads directly to the Galaxy’s second and Russell cranking wild clearances with Franklin bombing forward into crossing positions on the Galaxy’s right flank and Dunivant playing intelligent balls forward into space on the left.

Name Tags Required?

While the lack of offensive incoherence seemed a touch less in this match and a few promising passages showed that all is not lost in that department, the old bugaboo of defensive disorganization was on full display. If not for Willis, a few heroic blocks by defenders, and a number of missed chances by the Galaxy[1], the scoreline might have threatened to become truly embarrassing. And I saw little difference between the halves to suggest that Dudar-McDonald is going to be any more effective than Jakovic-McDonald[2].

Of course, that may not be fair given the lack of match time together for the previous two, but even then, three-quarters of the back line looks slow of foot and slow of thought. That’s probably aided by the lack of familiarity amongst the players, but for how many years has this been a problem for United? And when exactly does Jakovic ditch his persistent case of the brain-farts? Probably would have happened by now if it’s going to happen…

Not Olsen-ish Enough

But most damning to my eyes was the lack of fight and urgency on display at the end. Sure DeLeon got one back with an excellent finish, but United’s efforts down the stretch lacked the urgency and hatred of losing that Olsen possessed as a player and seemed to have instilled for a portion of last season. Wasn’t the idea of the big turnover and jettisoning of the old guard supposed to signal the turning over of a new leaf, a rejection of the corrupting culture of losing that had seeped into the club?

Hmmm.

Having said all of that, this game could so easily have shifted in United’s favor at a number of points. De Rosario and Santos both had presentable chances to give United the lead. The timing of the LA opener was a killer as having them stewing on dominating the first half with nothing to show for it might have proved useful for United’s second half efforts. And United had some good chances to pull goals back that they spurned.

While much of United’s play had me screaming at my screen in disbelief and frustration, there were flashes of decent attacking sequences. Unfortunately, I tend to be a glass-half-empty guy, so the former outweigh the latter in my mind. Still, missing two starters to Olympic duty and starting without our two Balkan DP’s on the field, there were things to build on here.

But if the defensive discombobulation persists, all that building will be on crumbling foundations placed on swampy ground, and that’s a blueprint for another campaign where the Black-and-Red go home early…


  1. Yes, I am fully aware that United can point to a number of woeful misses of their own.  ↩

  2. Indeed, Dudar looked worrying slow, both pace-wise and in reacting. Here’s hoping that’s more a function of his long stretch without competitive matches than anything else.  ↩

Staggering Out of the Gates | a DC United Match Reaction

Well, that went about as expected. Sporting KC are one of the strongest, if not the strongest, team in the Eastern Conference, and return almost their entire starting lineup from last year. Little wonder that they looked more fluid on the ball and in their movement than a United side that is still figuring itself out and integrating new pieces. Still, it’ll be a pretty pissed off United locker room knowing they were only minutes from a decent draw and a shut-out to boot.

What will rankle even more is that Ben Olsen has been harping incessantly on the need to improve on defensive set pieces. Where did they lose the game? Defensive set piece. It also looked to me that it was Woolard – who’s an adequate enough player, but not an MLS starter – who lost his mark, presenting an open header from the corner.


First Half

United played reasonably well from a defensive perspective, presenting KC with few good chances. That said, they created precious little of their own. Offensively, the lines were too static, with the fullbacks barely advancing past the center circle and neither the midfield or forwards checking deep to receive the ball. As a consequence, there were far too many hopeless long balls that KC’s back line gobbled up without much trouble.

One of the few exceptions where the lines blended was the neat interchange of passes worked by De Rosario and Pontius that sent the latter in for a decent try from the edge of the box that went wide. Decent chance. But the better chance was passed up. Salihi had made an excellent run into the space created when Pontius skipped passed one central defender, forcing the second to slide over into his path. Hard to blame Pontius for having a try at goal, but if he sees Salihi drifting into the box and touches it into his path, I think United go into the break up a goal.

Indeed, of the three DP-money guys on the United roster, I thought only Salihi actually looked the part. He was better on the ball than I expected with good close control, patience, and a bit of vision to boot. That said, he’s being paid the big bucks to stick the ball in the net, and the one solid look he had, he headed wide. It would have been a stretch to trouble the keeper at that range and from the angle Russell’s ball came in at, but Salihi got plenty of power, just not the direction. Neither De Rosario or Boskovic had much impact on the game.


Second Half

I expected that Olsen would make an adjustment at the break to counter the central midfield three of KC that were controlling the possession game, likely by dropping De Rosario into a deeper role, a move that might have helped him find time on the ball given the close attentions the central defense of KC were paying to him. Instead, it looked like Salihi doing more of the coming deep, and through a combination with the wide men pinching in a bit and the fullbacks getting forward, the possession leveled off more.

That said, KC always looked the more likely, getting an increasing number of chances as their midfield and forwards applied high pressure, won possession, and broke quickly. KC hunted for the ball in packs and broke in the same manner, consequently having a number of passing options near at hand or breaking into space. United also began to surrender more and more set pieces in their own end, which looked to be leading to disaster before the knock-out blow came in stoppage time.

Still, the second half was better from United’s perspective. Pontius and Najar received the ball more on the wings and got after their defenders, though neither could find a decent cross. That has to be one of the first notes on the white board tomorrow. With a predator like Salihi in the box making smart runs and a wild card like De Rosario ready to turn a half-chance into gold, you’ve got to get your head up and be ready to deliver, and both of our wide men have a tendency to want too many touches. Likewise, the lines blended better as midfielders and forwards starting dropping off to find space and show for balls to feet.

As the half wore on, both sides dipped into their benches for changes. It was here that the balance tilted. Wolff for Boskovic netted little. Wolff brought energy and a bit more bite to central midfield, but he did little to connect the dots in possession. Cruz for Pontius again brought energy, and Pontius probably isn’t ready to go 90, but pushing Najar onto the left saw him constantly cutting inside and dribbling into blind alleys, while Cruz did little of note on the right. Santos was the most impressive of the subs, winning the aerial challenges that had been going KC’s way prior to his introduction, and showing in flashes the understanding he has with De Rosario.

But it was a KC change that proved fatal. Sapong’s athleticism and interchanging of positions with Kamara, another terrific athlete, created problems for United’s defense, leading to a number of fouls, more lost aerial challenges, and ultimately the sequence that killed the game. A lost mark, yet another ball lofted into the box, and finally Hamid was beaten after making a handful of decent saves. The lateness of the goal left little chance for reply.


Conclusions

United would have been a touch lucky to escape with a 0-0, but this was a close and hard-fought match. I think you saw that in how much the late winner obviously meant to the Sporting players. While United created little offensively, didn’t have many coherent passing sequences, and looked a step slower than KC, that’s to be somewhat expected as United still have to integrate a number of new players and didn’t have much consistency in their pre-season preparations. From the run of play, the defense looked mostly adequate, though I’d expect Dudar to supplant one of McDonald or Jakovic before too long, particularly given that his height and experience will do much to bolster their efforts against set pieces, a weakness that continues to haunt United.

Quick Thoughts On: United v. Fire

Apologies if this is a bit scattershot, but the web feed was pretty rough (though much appreciated) and I'm enjoying some Cabernet Franc with my footie tonight...

* * *

Chicago controlled much of the possession and had more and better chances, but Hamdi Salihi did what he's been paid the DP cash to do. He got one half-decent chance, albeit from a tough angle near the edge of the box after a long ball out of the back, but he buried it to seal a 1-0 victory for United.

United's first half was abject. Chicago's burners up top were consistently getting behind the United defense, with only Willis (PK saved, 2-3 decent saves in the run of play) and Chicago's wayward finishing to thank for a 0-0 deadlock at the break.

The second half saw a much better performance with the wing attackers getting more involved and more sustained possession in general for United. Still, Chicago had a couple of good looks and might want to see a replay of Oduro's chance that pinged down off the bar and looked suspiciously close to crossing the line.

That said, United's "second team" did not show an appreciable drop-off from the starters despite the entire squad (bar Willis) being replaced in fits and starts. Given that depth and finishing have been the major foci of the FO's offseason, you've got to say that what we saw on the field justified their efforts.

As for formation, United came out in a 4-2-3-1 that shifted to a 4-4-1-1 or 4-4-2 at times based on De Rosario's freedom of movement and the wings getting pushed back by Chicago's outside backs. Generally, it looked like:

Willis in net with Jakovic (White) and McDonald (Dudar) in central defense. Russell (Korb) and Woolard (Guilherme) manned the flanks, while Saragosa (Rozeboom) and King (Shanosky) held down the deeper midfield positions. Salihi (Santos) operated alone up top with the trio of Najar (Cruz), Pontius (DeLeon), and De Rosario (King, latter Richter) supporting.

After the goal, and particularly after De Rosario came off,  United's more attacking midfielders dropped deeper into a 4-5-1 as they looked to protect the lead and hit on the counter. Though United weren't the dominant force possession-wise, the number of short goal-kicks and considered distribution from the back seemed to suggest that possession was being stressed. That said, both Russell and Dudar (and White on the winner) displayed a preference (and ability) to hit more direct balls out of the back.

Individuals that stood out (for good or ill)?

Jakovic looked particularly vulnerable against Nyarko's quickness (until Dejan kicked him out of the game...sigh) and quick balls over the top.

Dudar looked calm and in control at the back. Some of his balls were too ambitious and didn't come off and his passes back to Willis sometimes looked under-hit to me, but generally he was solid, particularly in snuffing out potentially dangerous situations with admirable cool.

Salihi had some decent moments of hold-up and combination play (as did Santos in relief), but scoring the one half-decent look he had is what he's getting the big bucks for.

Guilherme looked great on the ball and worrying without it.

Shanosky doesn't quite look ready -- too easy to push off the ball and not always smart with it.

Rozeboom, however, should be signed immediately. He looked calm and confident winning balls, distributing, and directing traffic. Don't know that we need him, Saragosa, Kitchen, and Morsink, do we?

Willis saved the early PK, was in good positions throughout, and looked every inch the capable backup he proved last year.

Saragosa might as well have been Morsink. Lunging tackles, misshit passes, deserved yellow (rash tackle at the end of a sequence after his poor pass lead to a transition chance for the Fire). Has to say something that the center of midfield wasn't so over-run when the rookie Rozeboom came on at the half.

Najar showed in spurts in the second half just how dangerous he is on the ball.

* * *

There's work to do, but the early indications are positive. Despite being largely outplayed, United found a way to win; the striker they brought in to get the goals got one; and the lack in drop-off when the subs were introduced speaks to the quality of depth that the club as made it a point to add this off-season. While the possession play was disjointed and the defense was left chasing far too often (though not every opponent will be as blessed with speed up top as Chicago), these are both problems you expect in pre-season, particularly with a number of new faces being integrated.

A Bridge Too Far | a DC United Match Reaction

Can’t fault the second half effort1. Can’t fault the entertainment value. Can’t argue we didn't deserve to crash out either. Heroic last-ditch efforts aside, it was over the last four games that the ghost was well and truly given up, not this one match that sealed the deal.

Talking points?

  • Good God, but De Rosario is a machine. Considering he was clearly gassed and sputtering on a flat tire, he still managed to find the equalizer and set up most of what was good near the end. Despite an overall spotty performance from the #7 given what he had to overcome, if Ngwenya manages to have a little more desire and bundle that late sitter home, I think De Rosario immediately becomes the MVP front-runner with a Kirk Gibson, walk-off-homer performance, single-handedly willing United toward the playoffs.

  • Kitchen at d-mid should be a lock for next season. Covered a ton of ground, won balls, kept the ball well in tight quarters, played forward more than back, and even managed to dictate a bit of tempo. Smart money leaves Simms, who’s past his sell-by date, on the expansion draft table.

  • Off-season priority #1? A finisher. De Rosario can make magic. Pontius can get a handful of goals from wide. So can Najar. But when the chips were down and the chances were coming fast a furious, there was nary a cold-blooded assassin to be found. Davies? Please. I’m going to have more to say about this in a few days, but suffice it to say, I’m not sending any money to France any time soon. Wolff? Past it, not his game any more. Ngwenya? Failed pathetically at the time of asking. Brettschneider? Does a job, but that job isn’t poaching. Actually, just getting some forwards with reasonable first touches and the ability to hit a well-weighted pass would go some way to improving this team. How often (mostly in the first half, truth be told) were balls pinged to the front line either lost after a heavy touch or given away when the subsequent pass proved woeful?

  • Off-season priority #2? Speed and quality at fullback. Sure the likes of Korb and Woolard give you lots of effort and plug holes in the lineup, but they’re not starting-quality top-flight material on either side of the ball. Depth, yes. Starters, no.

  • Wait. Revise that. Off-season priorities #1-5. Learn to defend a freaking cross

  • Bitch and moan all you like about those late non-PK calls (I certainly shouted at the screen as well), but the karmic balance was redressed. Considering the number of PK’s we’ve scammed this year, it was only fitting not to get one when we needed it most.

  • Questions for Ben. Why no adjustment in the first half to beef up the midfield presence to counteract the five that Portland packed in there? And why did the attack keep aiming right up the gut (packed with three central mids) rather than wide? Can’t fault the rolicking you must have given them at the half, but why so flat at the opening whistle? Why wait so long to make the final sub2? Why was Wolff on so long?

  • I generally like McDonald, but some of his decision-making (shot selection, pass selection, rough tackles) is terrible.

So that’s it then. We almost made it to the final game of the season with hope alive, but that awful run of results, unsurprisingly corresponding with the loss of Pontius, was the season-killer. There are seeds of hope for 2012 here, particularly with the young core put in place this season, but significant improvements need to be made around that core. Not so much in the depth, which is reasonable, but in a few areas that have proved glaring weaknesses all season. We’ll address those in the coming months3.


  1. Now the first half effort, on the other hand…bloodless seems a weak description. ↩

  2. Benefit of the doubt extends here. Olsen probably figured Ngwenya would fill his pants given the opportunity and so delayed bringing him on as long as possible. And so it proved. ↩

  3. Post-FM 2012 of course. Pre-order on Steam now and it’ll download and be ready for your unlocking pleasure at 5pm tomorrow (Thursday). Oh dear, oh dear. Job #1? Having a go with United 2011, I should think. Possible post series ahoy! ↩

Less Than Zero | a DC United Match Reaction

As the game wound to a close, I was toying with an opening line for a reaction post, something along the lines of: "These two teams could play for 90 days instead of 90 minutes and never find the damn net."

So imagine my surprise when a late whistle finally answered a United attacker flinging himself to the ground in the box. Given that De Rosario had been having a pretty tepid game, I fully expected his PK to be saved. When it wasn't, I glanced at the game clock up in the corner and had only one thought, one that's been burned into my brain over the course of this frustrating season so much that I've adopted it as something of a slogan for the 2011 season.

Back to the mean.

If you've been following United at all this season, you'll have been in the same boat as me, fully expecting that Chicago would find a way to equalize, to negate any nascent feelings of hope or elation, to deliver the metaphorical kick in the teeth and confirm the futility of our post-season pursuit. When it duly arrived, rather than heartbreak, my reaction was a cynical shake of the head, a wry smile and a shrug. Of course that was going to happen. It seemed only natural.

Back to the mean, you remember?

So what then to feel when Chicago found a second? Surely this was beyond the pale, more than a pegging back to the mean? Surely this was a dip below that even keel we've been relentlessly dragged back to? A fourth loss in a row, playoff hopes all but erased?

Less than zero.

I'm still not sure. There's a slight sense of disbelief, yes, but also a sense that expectations have been fulfilled. This isn't a playoff team. At least not without Pontius it isn't. A few weeks ago I said we could wave the post-season goodbye and had a little bit of pushback from those who somehow, miraculously, had not had the hope beaten from them yet.

I expect it probably is now.

Ugh.

Suspicious Minds | a USA Match Reaction

A win, 1-0 over a second-tier CONCACAF side, and probably just about a deserved one, though by no means hugely impressive. The US showed well in patches against Honduras, and a couple of individuals can be proud of their performances, but collectively, the one word that consistently appears in my notes, often double- or triple-underlined, is sloppy.

Too loose in possession, lots of dangerous challenges in flat-out stupid areas, and generally about a half-step slower than their opposition for large periods of play. Maybe some of that is down to a lack of confidence after the slow start to the Klinsmann era, maybe some can be laid at the feet of integrating new faces1, maybe you can even blame the weather. But at some point, you’ve got to start questioning the man in charge.

Let’s go line by line for a change, shall we?

  • Defense: Howard was immense as usual, keeping the US from going down early, then preserving the slender lead. The fullbacks had reasonable outings going forward, but were a bit suspect defensively and in the air, particularly on crosses to the back post. Little surprise that things looked a lot more solid with Onyewu replacing Orozco, who again wasn’t impressive. Can we declare that little experiment failed please?

  • Midfield: Edu looked well off the pace to start2, not reacting well with or without the ball, but grew into the game until yet another stupid, lunging challenge saddled him with yellow. Beckerman has his uses, and I can see an argument for his being included in the 23, maybe even in the 18, but I just don’t see him as starter quality at this level. Williams looks an interesting player3, good on the ball, reasonably composed. Shea continues to impress (despite some poor choices on the ball and a botched finish).

  • Forwards: Dempsey is the indespensible man now; the only one who you can rely upon to reliably find the back of the neck. His moment of quality was the difference and the one called back was typical CONCACAF whistleman bufoonery. Altidore and Agudelo are both handfuls for defenders in their own particular ways, but both are still works in progress and really need to be testing keepers with more regularity.

The big takeway? The result was important. There were some sequences that were promising. But the sloppiness on the ball and in commiting fouls in bad spots are both worrying. Honduras was wasteful4 and could so easily have made things more difficult. I’m going to chalk this tentatively in the positive column, bank those missed chances as ones that go in for a more confident crew, and see what Tuesday brings while maintaining my suspicions about Klinsmann.


  1. Though I think you’d find many wondering at the lack of breadth in the “new faces” audition line. ↩

  2. Blame the SPL?  ↩

  3. Particularly playing out of position on the right. Given how tidy he was, I wouldn’t mind seeing him in the middle, even as packed as it now seems. ↩

  4. Yes, yes, better finishing from the US and better whistlemen negate this, but still… ↩