Travel Sickness | a DC United Match Reaction

Apologies if this is a bit truncated, but I just got home 10 minutes prior to kickoff after a couple days on the road, so I'm trying to get situated and my thoughts are a bit scattered.

You want an idea of how much I thought we'd pull the "cardiac" move and snatch this one from the jaws of defeat? Well, I spent the last 20 minutes of the match catching up on my RSS feeds since I've been on the road and internet-less for the last two days. Of course, some of that was prompted by United bringing on Julius James, and me going, "What the hell? When did we sign Julius James?" Not that it mattered; my primary motivation for digging into the RSS feeds was to while away the time until the final whistle blew cause we sure weren't getting back into this match. Talking points?

* Pull the damn trigger, Luci! Now I can see Emilio making a quick turn and getting a shot off, maybe even a little feint to open a gap to fire into, but what the hell is it with trying to beat three defenders on the dribble? And while we're at it, can we pause to examine his running off the ball? Luci's not the fastest hound in the hunt, so when he hesitates on the last defender's shoulder (or flat out refuses to make the run), he's not going to get to the ball first too terribly often. Even if he does, the angle has long since been closed down.

* The problem with Jakovic. For every two slick bits of dispossession or calm play at the back, Jakovic manages to lob one softball to the opposing forwards in the form of trying to beat an attacker with the ball or simply making a terrible misjudgment. But to my mind, the slick bits are what make Jakovic so special and important. He reads the game well and often cuts the ball off and starts chugging up the field. Too bad there's nobody to cover for him when (1) he makes mistakes trying the high-difficulty, high-reward move and (2) moves forward with the ball at his feet.

* Tom Soehn's tactical masterclass. Is there a potential remedy for Emilio's problems? Well, besides telling him to shoot the damn ball, we might try playing someone up top with him. Soehn's 3-6-1 (yeah, I said it) leaves him either holding, trying to fashion something out of nothing, or the only one ahead of the ball to make the run. Pathetic. What about Jakovic's issues? Duh! Give him some cover at the back in the form of a second central defender.

* Slow and slower. Those seem to be our two attacking speeds. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate that we try to build up attacks and actually construct goals rather than lobbing the ball over the top, hopping for a bad bounce or mistake on the opposing defense's part, and relying on luck and speed to grab a cheap one on the counter, I really do. But when all of our pretty possession results in aimless crosses and hopeful through balls that get spit back out by a compact defense that's had time to array itself against us, it's hugely frustrating.

So is all lost? Probably not. This was an important opportunity in the playoff chase, but we've still got time to solidify our position. We've got a couple of new defenders to run into the mix, and might be adding a bit more attacking speed in the coming weeks. I'm still not in desperation mode, but I'm also running out of patience with Tommy's formational choices. At this point, I'd even take an actual 3-5-2 over this 3-6-1 nonsense (though, of course, I'd much prefer something that left us with four at the back).



  1. All is not lost...

    If they fire Soehn the milisecond this season is over.

    I don't see it happening until he leaves.

    We need a new face, a new vision, he can come in and get rid of everybody but Jakovic, Namoff, Pontius, Quaranta, Szetela, and Wallace for all I care.

    Olsen, Gomez, Moreno, Emilio, and Fred are SLOW, as you pointed out, and we cannot keep them all. None are spring chickens, time to focus on the future. I would be hesitant to dump Olsen and Moreno because of their service, and Gomez is doing alright, but COME ON. Time to create another legacy.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. If at least, with the new defenders, Soehn would go with 4 at the back and a formation that better fits the personnel, then there might be some hope.

    What do you think about ending the Wallace at D-Mid experiment? It seems like he could actually be the outside midfielder we need?

    I'm afraid that all is lost, and that we are going to watch this fall apart in agonizing slow motion.

    ---DCU Curmudgeon

  4. Some have said that firing Sohen now would not make a difference. But for those who wish to see the end of Tommy's 3-5-2 (3-6-1), replacing him may be the only way for that to happen as he insisists on staying with this formation. If for no other reason, I would argue that a different approach by someone else might be necessary. If he can't see the defficiency in this line up, he needs to go.

  5. The 3-5-2 more appropriately named the 3-6-1 by "The Full Back" is the slow death we are now calling the 2009 season. DCU is slow. It doesn’t have to be with the new blood on the team but they keep them reined in to tight and continue to play with a formation that all the successful teams don’t use. Listen, the coach has to be responsible for his style of play so if he can’t fix it, sack him! It takes forever for anything to develop from the mid field and when it does DCU fails to even shoot the ball. Why can't Soehn see this huge deficiency? I am slowly losing faith.

  6. I'm brooding as we speak, my friends. A post is suggesting itself, but hasn't yet taken shape. I think there are three big points to think about at the moment.

    (1) Formation isn't the only problem, as it only provides a shape in which to operate. The big problem is the lack of width and quick attacking thrusts. Are the players being directed to keep things short and glacial and narrow? If so, that's as big a problem as formation.

    (2) Our personnel just isn't suited to this formation. A solo front-runner needs to be strong, quick, dynamic, and constantly making runs to latch onto through balls and stretch defenses for the midfield to exploit with passing or running. Doesn't exactly sound like Emilio, does it? As for the back three...I think only Namoff is properly suited to such a formation.

    (3) Anybody else thinking about throwing the old, supposedly savvy dogs at the Champions' League, where their experience and slow, methodic possession might pay dividends? Give the league, which requires speed and hunger and commitment to the future of this team. Even if they fail, a hardened, experienced core will be fashioned in the fire of a do-or-die playoff challenge.